Sie fingen klein an. Sie wurden Riesen.
Dann vergaßen sie, wer sie groß gemacht hat.

Animation of an example appeal. A post is removed under the rule No harassment, and an appeal chip shows 14 days. In the draw, members close to the case are greyed out, 11 eligible members are summoned, 7 take seats and the rest are released because the jury is full. During the 72 hour window 6 votes arrive, 4 to reinstate and 2 to uphold, passing the quorum of 5. The decision reads Reinstated: 4 of 6, with the reasons shown without names. A note says that if too few members are eligible, a staff member who wasn't involved reviews the case.

1. The author has 14 days to appeal, once per removal.
2. 11 eligible members are summoned; the first 7 to accept are seated.
3. Excluded from the draw: the author, the reporters and the moderator; anyone blocking or muting them; the author's invitation chain; anyone who follows or is followed by the author; recent jurors.
4. Jurors get 72 hours to vote. They see the content without names, the rule as worded at the time, and both statements.
5. A strict majority reinstates; a tie upholds the removal. At least 5 votes are needed.
6. The author sees the counts and the reasons, with no juror names.
7. Too few eligible members? A staff member who wasn't involved reviews it, and the outcome says so.